Can selective retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy be better than unilateral retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy?

Can selective retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy be better than unilateral retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy?

Autor Arruda, Homero O. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Paula, Adriano A.p. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Suarez, Ruben Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Cury, José Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Srougi, Miguel Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Instituição Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Resumo OBJECTIVE: To propose a new modality of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy as a complementary treatment for patients with high risk, stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 76 patients with stage I nonseminomatous testis tumor (T1-T4, NX, M0) treated by orchiectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Among them, 33 patients underwent unilateral retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (URL) and 43 selective retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (SRL). URL consisted in removing the lymph nodes located around the great vessel homolateral to the tumor (aorta or vena cava and iliac vessels), and anterior and posterior to the contralateral great vessel (aorta or vena cava). SRL was performed removing the lymph nodes located anterior and between the great vessels (aorta or vena cava) and laterally to the homolateral great vessel, extending the distal dissection until the level of inferior mesenteric artery. In these groups of patients, the incidence of disease recurrence, disease-free survival index, and frequency of post-operative aspermia were assessed. Mean post-operative follow-up time was 96 months. RESULTS: In the SRL group there was only 5% of aspermia versus 79% in the URL group (p < 0.0001). Tumor recurrence was observed in only 5 of the 76 patients and was not related to the surgical technique. The disease-free survival rate after the mean follow-up of 96 months was similar in both groups, being 94% in the SRL group and 93% in the URL group. CONCLUSION: The selective retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy constitutes an effective technique with a lower morbidity than unilateral lymphadenectomy, representing an excellent option for the management of patients with high-risk, stage I nonseminomatous testis tumor.
Assunto testis
germ cell tumor
neoplasm metastasis
lymph node excision
Idioma Inglês
Data 2003-10-01
Publicado em International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 29, n. 5, p. 412-417, 2003.
ISSN 1677-5538 (Sherpa/Romeo)
Editor Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
Extensão 412-417
Fonte http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382003000500004
Direito de acesso Acesso aberto Open Access
Tipo Artigo
SciELO S1677-55382003000500004 (estatísticas na SciELO)
URI http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1846

Mostrar registro completo




Arquivos deste item

Nome: S1677-55382003000500004.pdf
Tamanho: 171.4Kb
Formato: PDF
Descrição:
Visualizar/Abrir

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Buscar DSpace


Navegar

Minha conta